How to Triple Hosted Legacy Application Performance

By Anonymous -

Challenges of Legacy Application Modernization

Legacy application migration often presents a prohibitive set of challenges for businesses seeking to modernize and adapt their applications with best-of-breed cloud services, such as AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Platform. Despite the compelling business drivers pushing them to complete digital transformation the cost and complexity of rebuilding these legacy applications to become cloud-native often forces them to seek alternatives.

The common answer is a “lift and shift” approach where the application and its existing data are essentially “lifted” from the on-premises environment and “shifted” to new hosting premises in the cloud with minimal changes. This reduces the migration costs and complexity since the application is essentially moved to cloud-based servers with almost no changes in architecture, schemas, or any other aspects of the design.

For example, an organization may decide to migrate QuickBooks or an ERP application from local servers to Azure virtual machines or AWS EC2 servers. This will allow them to enjoy some of the benefits of cloud migration with the main areas of focus being the compute, networking, and storage requirements for the migration.

Reducing Network and Compute Requirements for Hosted Legacy Applications with CentreStack

After the lift and shift migration is completed, users will typically access the hosted legacy application through a VPN connection or remote desktop services. Despite the broad acceptance of these connection methods, they lead to performance bottlenecks that can be eliminated with CentreStack.

Reducing Compute Requirements

When a legacy application is accessed through a published desktop, users tend to create performance problems as they use other applications that place high demands on the compute resources. A common example is web browsing with applications like Google Chrome. As users open multiple tabs in the browser while they work, they will notice significant degradation of performance as the number of user sessions quickly approaches the well-known limits of terminal servers. Providing a mapped drive on the user’s endpoint solves this problem by offloading file browsing and web browsing to the user’s local desktop and publishing just the application instead of the entire desktop.

Reducing Network Requirements

Alternatively, when users establish a VPN connection to the server, mapping a drive using the CIFS/SMB protocol can significantly increase the network load as users browse and access files. CentreStack provides a proprietary streaming protocol that is embedded in HTTPS. This significantly increases performance for the end-users and dramatically reduces bandwidth consumption.

The following diagram provides a high-level view of the basic architecture where the servers hosting the files and folders could be on-premises (as shown in the diagram) or lifted and shifted to a cloud data center.

CASE STUDY: Increasing Terminal Server Scalability by 300%

Rudy Yonkov is a Gladinet partner that runs an IT solution provider called Solution King. Their services include software development, hardware infrastructure, and enterprise-level hosting. Before becoming a Gladinet partner, his company built a practice that hosted Quickbooks, ERP, and other legacy applications on Azure virtual machines for customers. At first, they published desktops to provide remote access but then ran into the following problems.

  • Users started to complain about very sluggish performance
  • Terminal servers were approaching scalability limits averaging 40 sessions per server
  • End users were running resource-intensive applications Google Chrome with many tabs open
  • Needed to add more servers which increased costs

Because of his focus to maximize customer value, the business model could not absorb the increased costs or user complaints. So Rudy decided to change their approach by using CentreStack to provide mapped drive access from the end-user desktops to the hosted servers. This simple change allowed them to browse and access files from their desktop as if they were still on the same LAN as the terminal. And since he had offloaded file and web browsing to the client, he was able to use Terminal Services Plus to publish the legacy applications instead of the entire desktop with the following benefits:        

  • CentreStack’s File System Driver Based Mapped Drive boosted Terminal Server scalability 300% by :
    • Reducing the average number of sessions from 40 to 12 per terminal server
    • Allowing users to seamlessly browse and access files from their desktops
    • Running non-critical, resource-intensive applications like Google Chrome on the user's desktop 
  • Mapped drives proved far faster Gladinet's streaming HTTPS protocol than with VPN
  • Ability to manage, secure and control endpoint (auditing, reporting, ransomware protection, etc...)

“CentreStack saved my business by improving user experience while significantly reducing server costs for our hosted legacy applications." - Rudy Yonkov, Solution King

To learn more about this or other CentreStack use cases, schedule some time with me here: https://calendly.com/franklyn-peart 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Access and Backup to HP Cloud Storage

By -
Image
Today HP moved its cloud services to public beta. Gladinet has been working closely with HP Cloud Service since private beta to provide product integration support. Gladinet is also announcing today the support of HP Cloud Storage service with the full Gladinet Suite of products. In the latest Gladinet Desktop Client, you will see the HP Cloud drop down, which allows you to attach your HP Cloud Storage account into Windows Explorer as a mapped network drive. At the next screen, you can enter the related HP Cloud account information.
Read more

7 Biggest Limitations of SharePoint Online And How to Fix Them

By Anonymous -
Image
SharePoint benefits encourage businesses to migrate their file server data online. However, there are at least 7 limitations of SharePoint Online and OneDrive that need to be effectively addressed to reduce migration costs and eliminate OneDrive sync failures. In this article, we'll identify some of the common issues that complicate SharePoint migrations and ways to simplify the migration and solve the issues. Here's a list of common issues: 5,000 item limit in a document library 100,000 item sync limit for the OneDrive client NTFS permission reorganization requirements Maximum name length limitations Prohibitive costs of data reorganization 93 day recycle bin threshold Lack of support for legacy application data (databases, etc…) Obviously, you may not hit every issue in each migration but migrator beware if there's a lack of awareness of how these limitations could impact user experience, productivity, and cost. A Real-World Example Before we discuss each of these items...
Read more

Optimizing 3D Rendering and AutoCAD Performance in Remote Work Environments

By -
Image
Introduction: The Challenge of Remote Work Whether you are a design company or an architecture firm , you'll find that managing large 3D and AutoCAD files across remote team members creates performance and collaboration issues. This article introduces CentreStack as the one-stop solution for transforming your remote work experience. Identifying the Obstacles in Remote 3D Rendering and AutoCAD Usage The Challenge of Distance Data must traverse long distances when working in separate locations, introducing latency issues that hamper real-time collaboration. The Burden of Growing Files Technological advancements in 3D rendering tools and AutoCAD have led to larger file sizes, making performance even more of a challenge. The Downside of VPNs and Cloud Storage Solutions Traditional VPN technology has become more sluggish over time despite hardware upgrades or additional bandwidth. Common cloud services like Dropbox, Google Drive, and SharePoint aren't optimized for AutoCAD file typ...
Read more