Offsite Backup to Cloud Storage

By -

Offsite backup is like backing up to external drive. As long as the drive is there, people will use it to backup stuff. Some will do on-demand drag and drop of important documents. Some will go buy a $50 backup software to automate the process. Bigger companies may have more dedicate resources and software to handle it.

You may found a backup software on the Seagate external hard drive you brought home. On the other hand, you may very rarely buy a copy of the backup software and found an external drive attached.

Cloud Storage is like the external hard drive. As long as it is there and accessible, people will use it for backup purpose. Companies like Carbonite and Mozy specialized in online backup with online storage attached. These are the vertical players that bundles the desktop application, backup software and the online storage all together.

However, there are more and more cloud storage services providers coming out to join the race here. We saw Amazon S3, Windows Azure Storage, AT&T Synaptic Storage, Nirvanix, Mezeo. We also see Rackspace, Peer1, the Planet, Softlayer and all the traditional hosting providers(MSP) coming on board of the cloud storage game. Eventually the ISPs will come on board. (When you have your DSL internet installed, there is a cloud storage offering in the package?)

Will the same vertical play work? Can Carbonite compete with MSP/ISP for the same MSP/ISP user? Will this force each players to focus and specialize more in the cloud storage side such as the performance, scalability, optimization and so on?  We have seen cloud storage service that supports Amazon S3 interface gains application support easily

The competition will force players to focus and specialize in their strength. For example, we see hard drive makers focus on making hard drive. Application makers focus on making applications. If you see hard drive comes with an application, it is an OEM version from another company.

Gladinet is focused on the application side, the cloud access suites. Eventually the offsite backup will stack up vertically from the application to the service provider to the cloud storage backend software. Each one is focused on its strength.

 

gcd137 cafs137 gcb137

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

7 Biggest Limitations of SharePoint Online And How to Fix Them

By -
Image
SharePoint benefits encourage businesses to migrate their file server data online. However, there are at least 7 limitations of SharePoint Online and OneDrive that need to be effectively addressed to reduce migration costs and eliminate OneDrive sync failures. In this article, we'll identify some of the common issues that complicate SharePoint migrations and ways to simplify the migration and solve the issues. Here's a list of common issues: 5,000 item limit in a document library 100,000 item sync limit for the OneDrive client NTFS permission reorganization requirements Maximum name length limitations Prohibitive costs of data reorganization 93 day recycle bin threshold Lack of support for legacy application data (databases, etc…) Obviously, you may not hit every issue in each migration but migrator beware if there's a lack of awareness of how these limitations could impact user experience, productivity, and cost. A Real-World Example Before we discuss each of these items
Read more

Access and Backup to HP Cloud Storage

By -
Image
Today HP moved its cloud services to public beta. Gladinet has been working closely with HP Cloud Service since private beta to provide product integration support. Gladinet is also announcing today the support of HP Cloud Storage service with the full Gladinet Suite of products. In the latest Gladinet Desktop Client, you will see the HP Cloud drop down, which allows you to attach your HP Cloud Storage account into Windows Explorer as a mapped network drive. At the next screen, you can enter the related HP Cloud account information.
Read more

Optimizing 3D Rendering and AutoCAD Performance in Remote Work Environments

By -
Image
Introduction: The Challenge of Remote Work Whether you are a design company or an architecture firm , you'll find that managing large 3D and AutoCAD files across remote team members creates performance and collaboration issues. This article introduces CentreStack as the one-stop solution for transforming your remote work experience. Identifying the Obstacles in Remote 3D Rendering and AutoCAD Usage The Challenge of Distance Data must traverse long distances when working in separate locations, introducing latency issues that hamper real-time collaboration. The Burden of Growing Files Technological advancements in 3D rendering tools and AutoCAD have led to larger file sizes, making performance even more of a challenge. The Downside of VPNs and Cloud Storage Solutions Traditional VPN technology has become more sluggish over time despite hardware upgrades or additional bandwidth. Common cloud services like Dropbox, Google Drive, and SharePoint aren't optimized for AutoCAD file typ
Read more